Skip to main content

Siemer Milling Company v. Comm. (2019)

Updated over 2 years ago

Main Issue:

  • Process of Experimentation

Facts:

  • The taxpayer claimed the research credit for eight projects ranging from new products, process improvement, and machinery upgrades

  • The Court determined that none of the projects qualified

Conclusion:

  • The court found many of the projects failed multi-parts of the 4-part test.

  • Every project was found to fail the POE test

    • Reciting steps in a process does not explain how the process is scientific

    • Need a methodical plan involving a series of trials to test a hypothesis so that it constitutes an experimentation

Take-Away Point:

  • The taxpayer must demonstrate that there is a methodical process of experimentation and how it is used to test the hypothesis.

  • The court relied heavily on the UCC case.


If you'd like to know more, chat with us on Messenger πŸ’¬

Did this answer your question?