Skip to main content

Trinity Industries v. United States (2014)

Updated over 2 years ago

Main Issue:

  • Supplies expense

  • “Substantially all” rule

Facts:

  • Credits claimed for development of special order ships

  • Claimed all expenses associated with the construction and development of the first article/prototype ships which were then sold

  • IRS argued that non-experimental aspects of the ship development were not included as a qualified expense

Conclusion:

  • If at least 80% of the project is part of the process of experimentation, all costs associated with the project are eligible for the credit

  • Prototypes sold to third parties were also considered eligible expenses

  • The court allowed 2 of the 6 ships to be considered qualified for the credit

Take-Away Point:

  • Supplies can be substantial and if they are, need to make sure you have the analysis to prove that 80% of the project was part of a process of experimentation


If you'd like to know more, chat with us on Messenger 💬

Did this answer your question?