Skip to main content

United States v. Davenport (2012)

Updated over 2 years ago

Main Issue:

  • Internal Use Software / Process of Experimentation

Facts:

  • The taxpayer claimed the research credit for the implementation and customization of an ERP system

  • IRS argued that the research failed to meet the Uncertainty Test, Process of Experimentation test, and exception for IUS tests

Conclusion:

  • The court rejected the taxpayer’s claim that the implementation and customization of a third-party ERP involved Uncertainty or a Process of Experimentation

  • Only the original developer of the software (J.D. Edwards) would have Uncertainty at the outset of the research

Take-Away Point:

  • Taxpayer needs to establish that it engaged in a process of experimentation and the uncertainty existing at the outset of the research

  • Customization of third-party software (especially financial software) will rarely qualify for the research credit if no related proprietary software development


If you'd like to know more, chat with us on Messenger 💬

Did this answer your question?