Main Issue:
Funded Research
Facts:
Taxpayer claimed the research credit for client projects related to developing unmanned systems used in national security
The taxpayer claimed research expenses associated with a cost-plus fixed fee, fixed-price level of effort, and time and materials contracts
The Court determined that all the contracts were funded
Conclusion:
Generally, only fixed-price contracts may qualify for the research credit
Standard fixed-price contracts may qualify for the credit as long as the taxpayer bears the economic risk for the research (both costs and profit) and maintains substantial rights to the technology developed
Fixed-price level of effort contracts (such as hours worked) will likely be challenged if the payments are based on the level of effort rather than the result of the research
Take-Away Point:
The taxpayer must demonstrate that progress payments under a fixed-price contract are “contingent on successful performance”
“Course of dealing” or inspection or warranty clauses are not sufficient to establish that payments are contingent upon successful research
The Fairchild case is still the seminal case regarding fixed-price contracts and should be referenced when analyzing contract language
If you'd like to know more, chat with us on Messenger 💬