Skip to main content

Fairchild v. United States (1995)

Updated over 2 years ago

Main Issue:

  • Funded research – economic risk

Facts:

  • Taxpayers included QRAs associated with fixed-price contracts

  • IRS argued that taxpayers did not have economic risk

Conclusion:

  • The court rejected the government’s position stating the contracts allowed the payment only for the success of the research and its acceptance

  • Progress payments did not relieve the taxpayer of economic risk

Take-Away Point:

  • Companies performing research on behalf of others need to show the economic risk of failure


If you'd like to know more, chat with us on Messenger 💬

Did this answer your question?