Skip to main content

Suder v. Commissioner (2014)

Updated over 2 years ago
  • Owner who made $10 million per year and was qualified at 75% each year

  • Credible testimony presented related to his activities

  • “Reasonable” standard = paid under like circumstances for like activities

  • Expert “Compensation” testimony from the IRS and an outside consultant

  • Both experts compared Mr. Suder’s wages to those of other owners of like enterprises

  • The court allowed wages for base salary, annual incentive, and long-term incentive (~$2.5 million per year)

Main Issue:

  • Executive Compensation

Facts:

  • “Reasonable” standard = paid under like circumstances for like activities

  • Expert “Compensation” testimony from the IRS and an outside consultant

  • Both experts compared Mr. Suder’s wages to those of other owners of like enterprises

Conclusion:

  • The court allowed wages for base salary, annual incentive, and long-term incentive (~$2.5 million per year)

Take-Away Point:

  • Executives performing qualified, technological activities can substantiate their activity through contemporaneous documentation and credible testimony


If you'd like to know more, chat with us on Messenger 💬

Did this answer your question?