Skip to main content

Eustace v. Commissioner (2002)

Updated over 2 years ago

Main Issue:

  • Substantiation / Applying Cohan doctrine

Facts:

  • Taxpayers used estimates in place of actual amounts citing the Cohan rule

Conclusion:

  • The court denied the application of the Cohan doctrine citing the reconstruction of the QREs as unreliable and inaccurate and further noting that the presence of QRAs was also not established

Take-Away Point:

  • Companies are more likely to get court support in their estimates if it has proven that R&D activities are in existence and it is only the estimation of the amount of R&D at issue and the estimation method is credible


If you'd like to know more, chat with us on Messenger πŸ’¬

Did this answer your question?